Original AJATT Products

Don’t Try to Learn A “Language”

That’s right. Don’t learn a language. Any language. It can’t be done (except by John Travolta in that movie where he plays the angel — that’s Hollywood for you). So don’t try. Instead, do this:

1. Learn a letter/character
2. Repeat (1) until all basic characters are learnt. That’s 2000 in Japanese; 3000-4000 in Chinese.
3. Learn the meaning of a new word, (or, if necessary, learn a new character)
4. Learn the meaning of a phrase containing words from (3)
5. Repeat from (3)

It’s that simple. Everything else is decoration. Notice how “language” doesn’t crop up anywhere in there. This also hints at why you can become fluent in any language in such an apparently short time: because you can repeat steps (3) to (5) at a much higher speed than people who learn the same language as native speakers. I don’t know about you, but I never learned 50 new English words a day as a kid.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Twitter
  • HackerNews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • email
  • RSS
  • Add to favorites
This isn't extortion or anything, but donate to AJATT...OR ELSE!!! 0_0

Original AJATT Products

Read on:
  • Understanding The News: James’ Success Story
  • Don’t Do The Language, BE The Language
  • But I Don’t Have Time For Immersion!: How To Immerse Even When Your Time Is Controlled By Others
  • Table of Contents / All Japanese All The Time Dot Com: How to learn Japanese. On your own, having fun and to fluency.
  • 世界読書コンクール/International L2 Reading Contest
  • One Kanji Poster to Rule them All, One Kanji Poster to Bind Them, One Kanji Poster to View them All, and into the Mind Grind Them, Or “Shameless Product Placement is Good for the Wallet, and the Lymph”
  • Language Is A Martial Art
  • The Method
  • Table of Contents
  • 4 Comments »

    1. John B said,

      April 26, 2007 @ 10:40

      Totally agree. If I were starting Chinese over again from scratch I would have invested the six months of effort that it would have taken to learn the first 3000 or so characters and then started the task of proper learning. It would have saved me so much time compared to the piecemeal way I actually went about it.

      I wonder about how fast we learned words as children. I think the key was that, except for spelling tests and the like, we didn’t learn words explicitly like we are when studying a foreign language. At first we probably encountered hundreds or even thousands of unknown words per day and through that exposure slowly caught on. It was probably slower than 50 per day (after all, as adults we have the benefit of having already worked out all the concepts behind the words we’re learning, whereas when we were children we had to do that, too), but I suspect it was pretty fast.

    2. Peter Parisi said,

      July 22, 2007 @ 04:44

      Great site, and mucho hilarioso! Thanks!

    3. Mediat said,

      January 19, 2008 @ 00:03

      Learning the letters/characters first…wow, I never thought of that. I thought it was “learn the words first, and after 40 of so start learning sentences at the same time…and maybe, just maybe start learning the characters if you really really really really…..really want to.”

      why learn the characters first?

    4. khatzumoto said,

      January 20, 2008 @ 12:53

      Read the intro to RTK, here

    RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI

    Relevant, polite and/or obsequious comments welcome :D . Swearing NG. HTML OK.

    Comments are moderated very undemocratically, so be sure to keep a copy for your own records in case I'm PMSing.

    Feel free to put up any external links you want.

    AJATT | All Japanese All The Time is Digg proof thanks to caching by WP Super Cache