This blog post was brought to you by the generosity of AJATT's patrons!

If you would like to support the continuing production of AJATT content, please consider making a monthly donation through Patreon.

Right there ↑ . Go on. Click on it. Patrons get goodies like early access to content (days, weeks, months and even YEARS before everyone else), mutlimedia stuff and other goodies!

Less GTD, More GLOAF: Give Less of a Fucare

“By doing less, and focussing on the one thing that counts, you’re actually doing more.”

“Simplicity is the key to brilliance”
Bruce Lee

“Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication.”
Leonardo da Vinci

Giving less of a care.

Nowadays, “care” is a good word.
“I cyare about yew”, says that art teacher who gives the easy A’s, tells random stories and is too nice to tell anyone that their pictures are crap.

But originally, “care” meant “worry”. It meant “fret”. It meant “brood”. It was a bad thing. We still hold onto this original meaning in some set phrases, such as when children are jealously (and rather incorrectly) described as being “without a care in the world”.

GTD. Getting Things Done.
David Allen is a better man than me. He’s handsome. He’s funny. He does more for the world with his left pinkie than I ever have or will. That’s why, if he read this blog (which he won’t, but if he did), he wouldn’t be offended when I say that GTD, as much as it has helped, has also done a massive disservice to mankind.

GTD is a massive disservice to mankind.

David of the Allen wouldn’t be offended by that statement because David Allen himself knows that GTD is a disservice to mankind. He admits it openly. In the opening moments of the audio lecture version of GTD (which I once had on heavy rotation), Allen admits that the real way to solve the issue is actually to do less stuff.. To not do stuff. To leave things undone. To eliminate. To give less of a fucare.

But, he says, you little bastards aren’t going to do that; you aren’t going to simplify your lives; you aren’t going to eliminate. So here is GTD, a tool to help you capture and manage it all.

As I understand it, GTD is essentially a living, breathing, thoroughgoing rejection of the Pareto principle and all the rewards that the Pareto principle could bring.

Most of what you do, think and have doesn’t matter.

Secretly, you know this. That’s why you have so much resistance to doing it, or even thinking of doing it.

Somewhere deep, deep inside us, we know what matters. We know what needs to be done. And we know what isn’t it. That’s why we drag our feet so much about so much stuff, because it is busywork. Because it’s irrelevant.

But elimination, decisiveness, thinking about whether or not things matter, these aren’t memes 1 that are good for slaves to have. So you won’t find these ideas promoted too hard in schools or even to regular employees in businesses. The party line is that you should obediently do everything that’s set out before you and more. And don’t get me wrong…that is a good thing.
Just not for you.

I’ve seen this in my own life, in things big and small.
Here’s a petty example:

When I try to fit everything I can think of possibly ever maybe needing into my manbag — an iPhone, an Android tablet, a Pocket WiFi unit, a battery charger, a notebook…I forget the things that matter most: things like my headphones. My sweet, sweet, beautiful, cordless Bluetooth headphones. I can’t wear most headphones: they hurt my ears; they keep falling out; the bass sucks; the wires get all up in my bidniss (is that a word?). But these guys…these guys are my friend.

All my manbag needs is a wallet, an iPhone and some headphones. Three things. Everything else is replaceable. Everything else can be substituted.

It’s like that Mormon object lesson with the pebbles, the rock and the jar. Try to fit in all the pebbles and there’s no room for the rock. Stick the rock in first, and the pebbles will fall in place around the rock, fitting themselves in the cracks.

Another petty example:

At the end of 2011, I emptied my real life (paper) GTD-style inbox.
Into a trash bag.
A lot of the crap in there had been in there since 2010. Some even earlier.
Now, what does this mean?
It means that sleeping dogs can be allowed to lie. It means that things — even important-looking things (and paper documents have an incredible self-importance about them) — can be left alone. Untouched. Undealt with. Unsorted. Forever. And nothing bad will happen. In fact, only good will happen.

When you try to do everything — or even just make and maintain lists of everything — via GTD or otherwise — you probably will get more done. You’ll have checklists with lots of stuff ticked off. But…But. All the crap you get done probably won’t matter that much. You’re likely to get everything done but what matters most. You will run yourself ragged with minutiae. And you’ll be a good slave, but that’s all you’ll ever be.

The one thing that is most important to a slave is to figure out how not to be a slave. All a slave’s available resources — time, money, words, attention — should be spent on this important thing. GTD and its ilk teach (despite the best of intentions) you how to do everything but what matters. Because when you try to do 2 everything, “what matters” has to take a massive hit for the team.

No doubt GTD includes some indirect elimination somewhere, but that’s just the problem: it merely includes elimination when it needs to be elimination. Elimination can’t be a token ethnic minority character or even a loyal sidekick; elimination needs to be the protagonist. Elimination needs to be the default behavior. By default, just don’t do it. Give less of a fucare. Unfortunately, GTD by default is all about listing it all! List it all! And manage it all! So you can be free. No…you just spend your life juggling lists. List limbo.

Most things do not need to get done. Ever. Some things do need to get done. But usually like one or two things. Everything else can be left alone or done half-buttockedly. And, yes, it’ll be imperfect. But it’ll be imperfect even if you have a heart attack trying to do it all. No doubt there are exceptions, but you’re not a surgeon and I’m not curing cancer, so let’s not kid ourselves.


But what?

“But what if bankers and electricians and train conductors and surgeons just start doing as they please, all willy-nilly?!”
It’s always people who are neither bankers nor electricians nor conductors nor surgeons who ask questions like this. You push paper, OK? Calm down.

SAITO Hitori, one of Japan’s richest men (and her highest individual taxpayer) puts it best:
“Human beings are perfect at 78%. There is no 100% for humans. 78% is human perfection.”

Things are going to be imperfect either way, but one way is fun and the other way sucks.

The point of hockey — of just about any game — is to score goals. The goal of the game is…goals. If what you’re doing doesn’t help you score, you might as well rest. Get off the ice. Sit it out. Chillax. Swallow some Pocari Sweat. It’ll be far more helpful than whatever busywork the world at large is trying to rope and guilt you into doing. It might even save your life — most (as in 90%-ish most) hockey injuries happen near the ends of periods, when people are most tired.

Important things are better done badly than not at all.
Unimportant things are better not done at all than done well.
Most things are unimportant.
Most things don’t need to be done.

You don’t have a kajillion things to do. You only have one thing to do. Decide on that one thing. That one thing should be so important, so valuable, that if it were the only thing you did the entire day (or what’s left of it), your day would still be a roaring success. That’s the kind of imbalance I’m talking about.

Bar causing other people harm, it doesn’t matter what else you do if you score.

The Pareto principle tells us 3 that life is beautifully imbalanced. A vital few things are incredibly important, and a trivial many are neither here nor there. In any group of ten things, there is almost always one that is by itself worth more than the other nine put together. We want to exploit this imbalance.

I hate it when people criticize me or my ideas. While my twisted, passive-aggressive, quasi-gentlemanly pride has generally kept me out of flame wars, in my heart of hearts I’m always like: “DON’T QUESTION ME!!!! NO! YOU DON’T GET IT!” So it actually pains me to call out GTD like this because I like David Allen; I enjoy his work; I think he’s really insightful.

Andbut 4 the man is better than the system.  The system –GTD — needs more work. They system needs to get in bed with (the ideas of) Pareto and Parkinson and Koch and Gawande. Pareto and Koch to eviscerate the waste, Parkinson to compress the time and Gawande to keep the checklist-making at that sweet spot where it’s useful but not overwhelming.


Let’s bring it home for Japanese.
A lot of you basementfags fine, upstanding denizens of the Japanophilic regions of the Internet care way too much.
And what for?
What on or off earth for?
You’re going to die and be eaten by maggots, yet you persist in forcing yourself to manually enter the boring, unnatural content of some book of sentence patterns — every single one! — because you think it’s “good for you”? Because you “have to finish what you started”? Because you “should”?

You’re afraid of using Lazy Kanji because it’s not “hard enough”?


Are you sick?
Do you like pain?

Stop it.
Don’t GTD.

Give less of a care. You only have so many to give anyhow. You only have so many fucares to give. Don’t go wasting them on pointless crap. Use them where they matter most, on the people who matter most. Or…do go wasting them on pointless crap, but know that you’ll be fresh out of fucares when it comes to things that actually matter.

You wouldn’t buy a tub of ice-cream, scoop the ice cream out, set it aside somewhere else and try to eat the packaging the ice-cream…hold on…I’m gonna go buy some Häagen-Dazs…OK I’m back…and then try to eat the p…dang, this is good…and then try to eat the packaging the ice-cream came in, would you? That would be madness. That would be Sparta. It would take time and energy and give you stomach trouble and gross you out.

The ice-cream of life — the important bits — is hidden in packaging. It’s wrapped in layers and layers and layers of packaging — busywork, distraction, indecision, guilt, waste, triviality. In fact, there’s more packaging than ice-cream. But don’t be fooled. Don’t eat the packaging. Just eat the ice-cream.

When you try to learn every word or sentence possible, what matters most — getting used to Japanese — suffers. When you refuse to delete cards because “you entered them” and “you need to know” what’s on them, you effectively delete all your cards, because you start to avoid the SRS altogether. When you try to do a gazillion reps in one sitting, what matters most — doing reps at all — suffers.

Don’t let the trivial many things you could do overpower the vital few that matter.
The list of things you could possibly do is not a democracy. It’s an oligarchy. There is no equality in the list; there is only rampant inequality.

Success is not measured by the number of things that get done. Success is not measured by the proportion of things that get done 5. I used to think it was. It’s not. Because only one or two of them matter to begin with. Only one or two are even worth doing. And if only one or two are even worth doing, then there’s no need to list all of them. No need. Only list enough to get you some candidates to look at…like 3 or 5 or 10. Then pick the one that matters most and run with that.

I don’t know the rules of chess. But I know that you don’t win at it by mowing down as many pawns as possible. Screw the pawns. Take that king. Screw the pebbles. Go for the rock. Handle the rock. Get the rock in first and screw everything else. Boom. Headshot.

Be stingy — economical — with your time and worry 6.
Save your fucares.
Start GLOAF today! 7

“Operations of thought are like cavalry charges in a battle — they are strictly limited in number, they require fresh horses, and must only be made at decisive moments.”
~ Alfred North Proactiv Clearasil Whitehead 


  1. They are the memes of powerful, free, wealthy people. Not necessarily rich people — as wealthy people can be temporarily unrich…but more on that some other time
  2. or even just list
  3. (crap, this sounds like…a sermon…like…”The Honorable Elijah Muhammad teaches us”…oh well 😀 )
  4. new word! 😛
  5. Success is measured, if it’s measured at all, by the significance of the things that get done. We’re not doing things by the pound here. Surely, the baby of the family isn’t the least valuable just because she weighs less then everyone else? You only need to do one thing, homeslice.
  6. and action!
  7. You just got done reading my crappy, gloafy writing. Let it never be said that I wasn’t a man who practiced at least some of what he preached 😛 .

  17 comments for “Less GTD, More GLOAF: Give Less of a Fucare

  1. April 11, 2012 at 00:40

    Slightly difficult to follow in some parts, even for you Khatzumoto, but very encouraging nonetheless! This post reminds me of this excellent post by Gwern about the irrelevancy of most stress:
    An excerpt:

    “Similarly, it is not required of you that you dine at fine restaurants night and day – merely that you live in good health. A 50-lb bag of dog food will last you around 17 days (assuming you eat quite a bit every day); that, potable water (freely available), and a large multivitamin (around 100 days). The food would be around $20, the multivitamins amortized over several 17-day periods perhaps $3, and then an indeterminate amount for gas; let us put expenses at perhaps 30 dollars. A single soda bottle can be redeemed for ¢5, so to cover your expenses would require the redemption of 600 cans, or 36 cans a day, or 2.25 cans per waking hour. Is this an onerous task?”

    The slave metaphor that you mention has been buzzing around my brain for quite a while. In reality, most of us, economically, are slaves or prisoners to our society and the organizations that constitute them. We do their dirty work to acquire food and shelter. In that sense, people like Warren Buffet are really just escape artists. Really…Warren doesn’t need social skills at all anymore. In america, even panhandling for a living is in a sense illegal since you cannot pay for housing with such an income, and you are required to pay someone else for housing in america if you do not want to get arrested for things like sleeping in public view.
    In reality, doing the minimum to control your own destiny and survive, as gwern points out, really isn’t that much. Though I frequently kvetch about my poopy university, I know that all I really need to do is have enough food and water to survive. In my spare time, I publish ebooks to amazon, barnes and noble, and other platforms, and the few i have done have earned me a small but reliable pittance which i could survive on in a pinch.
    Anyway, such a life would be glorious for the amount of free time available to me.

  2. フレヂィー
    April 11, 2012 at 01:42

    I had once the pleasure of working for a CEO who on my first day at the job saw me writing a list… he said to me “throw that away, and just do this one thing for me, because this one thing is important to the company (that one thing was an small little php web-app to capture info from one software to our set of tools). That was all he wanted me to do. As time went on he had this same mindset for almost every process of the company, where no one was ever working on more than 2 things at a time… quite efficient! I learned a great deal working with that man.

    “That one thing should be so important, so valuable, that if it were the only thing you did the entire day (or what’s left of it), your day would still be a roaring success. That’s the kind of imbalance I’m talking about.”

     In thinking about that line above, and I mean really thinking about it… makes you realize the importance of doing the ONE thing that will make your whole day seem worth while.

  3. lisbet
    April 11, 2012 at 03:15

    This post came just when I needed it the most. You’re right- I have a things-to-do list a mile long every day, plus lists of thigns I’ll get to when those are done. I really do need to GLOAF. Plus, I love saying “gee-loaf”

    I added a couple of quotes from this article to my Evernote Inspiration file.  

  4. April 11, 2012 at 13:59

    Couldn’t agree more. But here’s the real secret, shared with only a few people, and the rest of you I’ll have to kill. Getting Things Done is not about getting things done. It’s about appropriate engagement. And, to your well-placed point, many times appropriate engagement means NOT getting something done. But, of course, if you’re here (on the planet, in your room, on the bus) to get something done (which I’ll bet is true), if you’re not getting it done, you’re not appropriately engaged. So, something won’t be on “cruise control” and it will hijack your ability to be present, in the moment, with life.
    Loved the blog; keep it coming.
    All the best,
    David Allen

  5. Francesco
    April 11, 2012 at 20:35

    Brilliant, brilliant post…I guess we could all benefit from some minimalism in our busy lives.
    BTW I came in contact with GTD thanks to AJATT, and it really helped me make better choices based on stronger “NO!”s and a much more focused engagement with the tasks at hand.
    GTD has it’s place, but it shouldn’t become our next obession/religion.
    Still, I consider both Khatz and David Allen to be great role models to follow, and two of my personal heroes 🙂

  6. blackbrich
    April 12, 2012 at 08:16

    Long blog post FTW.

  7. olimay
    April 12, 2012 at 17:08

    すげェー, Khatzumotoせんぱい and David Allen converge on one post. Wow! Let me throw in Taleb:

    “The capacity for boredom is the most underestimated of all human assets.”
    Properly functioning, it’s a great b***t detector, he says.

  8. Mark
    April 18, 2012 at 13:59

    Stop showing off! We know you can read Japanese, you don’t have to constantly prove it. Why write an article in English and then put a link of the Pareto principle that is in Japanese? If you think it shouldn’t matter, write all your posts in Japanese and see if you can maintain readership. 

    • 名前
      April 19, 2012 at 00:56

      I don’t think it is showing off — he suggests that you be immersed in the language; if you follow 5 English links in his blog post, how would you be doing that exactly? It would almost be hypocritical of him if he only included English links in all of his posts.
      You don’t have to understand something entirely to be able to get something out of it. If you really can’t get anything out of the article in Japanese at all, and you’re interested in it, simply follow the link and go down to “English” on the left, and click it.

    • Nate
      February 4, 2014 at 08:41

      Mark… you must be new here.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *