Are You New to this website? Start Here!

...And if you're not new, check this out, playa :) ↓

So good, it's scary.

@Random Post

↑ Click up there to read a randomly selected AJATT post -- the electronic version of thumbing through a book :)

[Archive]

Speaking: You Don’t Have A Linguistic Problem, You Have A Humanity Problem — Why You Still Suck At Speaking and How to Fix it Fast

December 4, 2012
By
This entry is part 12 of 15 in the series Intermediate Angst
This entry is part 6 of 13 in the series Secrets of Speaking

Occasionally I take a break from the mom and hooker jokes and do something even worse: I go way out my decidedly shallow intellectual depth. I think the last time was when we talked about the nature of knowledge — the whole zero-certainty idea (not uncertainty, because that’s a form of reverse-certainty, but zero-certainty, a complete absence of expectation), particularly as it relates to self-confidence and stuff.

This time, it’s back to a more explicitly to a language-related thing. I guess if you were gonna give this a topic name, it might be called a mix of applied linguistics  epistemology and semiotics…But, I don’t even really know what all those words actually mean and I’m just using them to seem intelligent, so…suffice it say that today I’d like to share some ideas with you about speaking, as in speaking Japanese, your adopted language.

Specifically, what I’d like to talk about is how, when it comes to speaking, a lot of times, you hear learners of an L2 lament that they have, or are having, trouble expressing themselves, especially compared to their ability to express themselves in their L1. This is often accompanied by some assertion to the effect that they’ll never be able to express themselves in their L2 as freely and lucidly as they can in their L1 1.

But lately I’ve begun to wonder — is that really true? Are you really having a problem expressing yourself in Japanese/whatever your L2 is, or is there something else — something deeper — happening? It’s a simple enough question, but the answer isn’t as straightforward, because, as it turns out, there are actually three or four separate things going on here:

  1. Actual linguistic (in)ability issues
    • This is where you’re simply not used to the language, the L2. You’re a relative beginner. So, yeah, your powers of expression are going to be weaker and you fully expect them to be so. Most beginners are accepting of this fact and don’t have too much angst about it 2
  2. Unfair comparison to L1
  3. Unduly optimistic evaluation of powers of expression in L1
    • This is a more insidious isotope of #2 up there, and it’s not something that’s always as easily resolved by argumentum ad mathematicum 3 because even relatively “advanced” 4 learners have this problem, and it’s what I’d actually like to talk about today.

Bottom line: you’re not nearly as good at your native language as you think you are. No, really. Yes, you, girl who always got perfect grades in English class. I can see you over there, guy who both knows what “skeuomorph” means and can spell it correctly without checking. And this is perhaps especially true of people like you, because people have been telling you all your life how awesome you are at “language arts” 5, and so now your entire identity, your entire self-concept is wrapped up, coiled all nice and tight in and around the counterfeit totem pole that is your vaunted verbal acuity.

I’m not saying you’re not good at your L1. I’m sure you are. I’m saying that a lot of your precious “expressive power” isn’t expressive power at all. It’s just…a combination of habit, triangulation and resignation.

  • Habit: You are in the habit of using your L1. You’re used to it. You’re comfortable in it. You’ve worn a nice groove into it kind of like Homer Simpson’s couch has molded to his buttocks.
  • Triangulation: AKA circumlocution. Whenever you can’t express an idea accurately (which is surprisingly often), as in really really hit that nail on the head, like a nothing-but-net swoosh of a three-pointer, you instead express it in terms of what it’s not, what it’s like and what it’s a combination of. In basketball terms, you rebound and use the backboard and pass the ball around and sometimes just throw something up there to beat the shot clock. Sorry, I was playing NBA2k13 the other day on my friend’s iPhone, so…
  • Resignation: Without even realizing it, you are resigned to being unable to completely and perfectly express yourself in your L1, your native language. You’ve just accepted it. And you’re so used to accepting it, so habitualized to triangulation and resignation and making do with expressing 80% of what you mean, that you don’t even notice any more. You’re like a cat lady who can no longer smell the cat on herself.

If you ever stopped to think about it, I mean really think about it, you would realize that there are and always have been significant gaps between your thoughts, the ideas and feelings in your head, and the words that come out of your mouth 6. But you don’t think. About it. You ignore it and you take your 78~80% L1 powers and treat them as if they were 100~150% and compare them to your L2 and find your L2 self wanting. Well, of course you do! Of course your airbrushed Cameron Diaz linguistic abilities have no acne. You’re not looking at them accurately.

Why the numbers 78% and 80%? No real reason. They just sounded cool and vaguely right. I got the 78% figure from Saito Hitori (on-and-off Japan’s #1 individual taxpayer and therefore one of her richest citizens) who likes to say something to the effect of: “There is no such thing as perfection for humans. There is no 100%. Humans are perfect at 78%. 78% is human perfection” — I’m paraphrasing, but not too wildly. The 80% figure is from the Pareto principle as expressed by Richard Koch in his so-good-it-turns-me-on 80/20 book series.

So the takeaway point here is: make do. When it comes to speaking, make do with the words and phrases you already know — the simpler the better. And you know what’ll happen? You’ll feel better and do better and people will think you are better at Japanese. Weird, huh? How could working less and using less make you seem more awesome? I’m waiting for Alanis Morissette to call me so she can include this situation in the acoustic hip-hop remix of Ironic. If you want to be understood, speak less “accurately”: it’s like rain on your wedding day.

Speaking from personal experience (as if I ever spoke any other way ;) ), as far as your interlocutors are concerned, your worst (i.e. most confusing) conversations in Japanese will be the ones where you tried to express yourself 100% instead of 80%. Why? Well, because your speech will not only be more halting and jarring than is comfortable (even in real, unscripted dialog), but also ridiculously convoluted in its phrasing, because it’s trying to stay 100% loyal to some “original” (usually English-language) thought in your head — in a way that just doesn’t work in Japanese. Better to use the simpler, more natural phrasing that communicates 80% of what you want to say, than aim for some 100% that won’t be reached and isn’t worth reaching for.

You don’t have a language problem, you have a humanity problem. To be human is to be misunderstood 7 most of the time and in most places, even by the people who like you, even by yourself. And that’s perhaps part of why we spend so much time and effort communicating: not to eradicate the problem but to mitigate it.

So if you’re a relatively game boy advanced learner, next time you’re frustrated with your speech, don’t fret and try to raise your vocabulary level 8: raise your acceptance level instead. Be more accepting of what you’ve got to work with right now. This is similar to though not quite exactly the same as lowering your standards. In any case, fundamentally, your L1 standards are already low; you just didn’t realize that they were low. Until now. Go forth, then. Do yourself a favor. Give yourself the gift of resignation.

Am I saying to speak badly and make mistakes because it’s all good in the ‘hood? No. Not at all. I still hew closely to the AntiMoon advice of only saying things you’re sure are correct 9 What I am saying is: say L2 things you are sure are correct 10 and that you know how to say even if they don’t 100% match what was in your head. Because that’s how you talk in your L1 anyhow.

Series Navigation<< How to Stop Worrying and Accept that Learning a Language is Unfair — Going Beyond Day Trader Style Language LearningMastery is Mastering the Basics >>
Series Navigation<< How to Pronounce JapaneseLanguage Is Acting >>

Notes:

  1. And lest you think this is a one-way problem, a Japanese girl I know who’s learning English shared this very same concern with me.
  2. I feel like I’m using angst incorrectly here…like I can’t use it in a phrase like this, but…I’ll try not to have to much angst about it :)
  3. somebody, please, correct this Latin! I’m sure there must be something wrong with it :)
  4. I always think of the Game Boy Advance when I hear this word; obviously I was familiar with the word before the console came out, but now…it’s all about the GBA
  5. The gay, PC name for English class
  6. i.e. the words you speak when expressing those thoughts. To some extent, a language creates and/or enables the thoughts in the first place, but we’ll just politely ignore that for now
  7. and imperfect?
  8. I’m not saying “don’t learn new words”. Do. It’ll make you literally and figuratively richer. I’m just saying…yeah…don’t freak out about vocab in particular or expressive power in general. Don’t make it your problem.
  9. AJATT: AntiMoon’s Japanese lovechild :P
  10. in terms of grammar/vocab/syntax/common usage/whatever
You've got to get your priorities straight, dawg. Donation to AJATT now...Sex-change surgery later.

The Emotional Sentence Pack
The MCD Revolution Kit

8 Responses to Speaking: You Don’t Have A Linguistic Problem, You Have A Humanity Problem — Why You Still Suck At Speaking and How to Fix it Fast

  1. Matt on December 5, 2012 at 11:10

    At least one reader: “Oh awesome, he’s going to tell me how to fix my speakin-… ‘lower my expectations’? Sonofa…”

    Brilliant stuff. You’ve still got it, Khatz.

  2. dtcamero on December 5, 2012 at 15:01

    awesome essay, well done

  3. Oliver on December 6, 2012 at 09:30

    My friend Meei-Jiuan always fretted about her English when we lived down the hall from each other in NYC. But I talked with her for hours, and I loved talking to her. Sometimes she would say things so plainly, so clearly, so simply that it formed a blade of insight that cut through my bulls### well-rehearsed, well-spoken preconceptions. I told her that sometimes what she said was like poetry, but I think she only half-believed me and thought I was making fun of her. :)

  4. フレヂィー on December 6, 2012 at 09:31

    By and far one of the best [記事] on AJATT, yet. And coincidentally just the other day this was proven to me by a native Japanese colleague in our Japan office. I usually chat with him in Japanese and lately I’ve noticed that saying too much, or what is in my head, is not really the avenue to travel on. So, I’ve just began to regurgitate stuff I know 99.9%. Sure enough, my Japanese 連中 starting telling me that lately I’ve been sounding [aka chatting] more natural and just by saying less. S### blew my mind!

    Thanks Khatz!

  5. ahndoruuu on December 7, 2012 at 15:49

    Friggen thank you, Khatz. You’ve retained your penchant for looking at the simple things before inventing a complex problem. It’s this kind of thinking that has given us the library that is AJATT in the first place.

    It’s not an L2 issue, it is most definitely a speaking problem in and of itself. Speaking clearly, logically, and expressively is actually not an easy thing and most people royally suck at it, myself included. One can either train herself to speak in that manner, or she can accept that perhaps speaking clearly, logically, and expressively is not very important.

  6. lovinglanguage on December 10, 2012 at 23:33

    This is so good. Thank you. I’m stuck in the intermediate stage, so you’re speaking to my pain. My problem, though, is comprehension. I can circomlocute like a master, but the response is garbledygook. What do you suggest for that?

  7. [...] Stick to the script. Cheat if you can get away with it (which is almost all the time). And then, if the worst comes to the worst, just B.S. your way out of it. [...]

  8. june on December 18, 2012 at 11:05

    The answer people were looking for:

    Hi, you still suck because you didn’t do what I (Khatzumoto) said. Under all the crazy-eyed “Must have fun~!” talk, there are some cold, hard numbers. And a checklist. In your target language…

    Do you read 60-90 minutes a day?
    Have you been reading 60-90 minutes a day for two years?
    Do you do your SRS reps and additions each day?
    Have you gotten to 10,000 sentences (or whatever the current method is)?
    Do you listen at least 13 hours a day?
    Have you been listening at least 13 hours a day for two years?
    Do you have a native speaker friend who mercilessly corrects every not-native sounding thing you say/utter?

    If you answered ‘no’ to any of these questions, that’s why you still suck.
    If you answered ‘no’ to any of these questions, of course you still suck.
    If you answered ‘no’ to any of these questions, don’t complain about sucking.

    Follow my (Khatz’) ‘far king’ program.

    After all of that, if you still actually suck, then you have a humanity problem, rather than a linguistic one.

    —–

    (All information gathered from this site. None of it made up or distorted.)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *